Saturday, July 15, 2017

In 70% Black Baltimore, Elected Officials Oppose Mandatory One-Year Sentence for Illegal Gun Possession b/c it will "disproportionately impact black people"

If you've read The City that Bleeds: Race, History, and the Death of Baltimoreyou know black people in Baltimore carefully protect their city by using black criminality to keep out white people from ever being a demographic threat to run things again.
"We gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well..." Now elected officials in 70 percent black Baltimore are protecting black criminals from mandatory one-year sentences for illegal gun possession... because it will impact blacks.


Now imagine this 70 percent black having black elected officials - representatives of the state - protecting black criminals from a legal system they've deemed not just racist, but replete with implicit bias. 

Oh, it's true. [Baltimore leaders propose mandatory sentence for illegal gun possession, Baltimore Sun, 7-14-17]:


Baltimore leaders on Friday proposed a mandatory one-year sentence for illegal gun possession within 100 yards of a school, park, church, public building or other public place of assembly within the city. 
The bill would prevent any part of the one-year sentence from being suspended, and preclude those with such convictions from receiving parole. 
Mayor Catherine Pugh said she’d like to do more to restrict guns, but “this is what we can do locally” without changing state law. 
Pugh acknowledged that there is a church or a school “on nearly every corner” in the city, and said “as it relates to this legislation, that’s a good thing.” 
Police Commissioner Kevin Davis praised the bill as a much-needed change to help the city address its soaring violence. The city is on pace to surpass 300 homicides for the third year in a row. Before 2015, that mark hadn’t been reached in Baltimore since the 1990s. 
Police Commissioner Kevin Davis praised the bill as a much-needed change to help the city address its soaring violence. The city is on pace to surpass 300 homicides for the third year in a row. Before 2015, that mark hadn’t been reached in Baltimore since the 1990s. 
City council members there in support of the bill were Leon F . Pinkett III, Isaac “Yitzy” Schleifer, and Robert Stokes Sr. Other council members voiced their opposition to the bill Friday, including Ryan Dorsey and Kristerfer Burnett. 
Dorsey said the legislation should not be fast-tracked. 
“This is not something that we should decide on overnight,” he said. “It’s going to disproportionately impact black people and communities negatively. I haven’t seen any evidence that mandatory minimums actually deter any sort of crime.” 
Burnett said the city would be better off increasing funding for Safe Streets and schools to combat violence. 
“We should treat violence as a public health issue,” he said. 
He argued that mandatory minimums do not decrease crime. 
“We are under a lot of pressure right now from community members living in neighborhoods experiencing violence to do something,” Burnett said. “I don’t want to minimize their fears, but we have a responsibility to enact good policy as well.” 
Some criminal justice reform advocates and defense attorneys also expressed opposition to the bill. 
Councilman Brandon Scott, chair of the public safety committee, said he believes there are good intentions behind the bill, but he also has some concerns that must be discussed as he and his colleagues consider the legislation. 
“We know mandatory minimums have been specifically shown to overwhelmingly impact poor black people, and in Baltimore we know that we have an unfortunate abundance of poor black people, particularly poor black men who have already been impacted by mandatory minimums,” Scott said.  
“We have to figure out how to make sure that those violent repeat offenders who feel comfortable carrying guns are being punished, but at the same time we cannot have things that are going to make things worse when you’re talking about the grand scheme of young poor black people in our city.” 
Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby, whose office often strikes plea deals with gun offenders in which the offenders receive sentences of less than a year in prison, was not at the press conference. 
In response to questions about the bill and its potential impact on plea negotiations, her office released a statement that did not mention the bill. It said Mosby is “committed to holding criminals who wreak havoc in our city accountable for their actions and support all efforts intended to strengthen gun control.”

Not once, but twice we get an admission black people are responsible for virtually all the crime/gun crime in 70 percent black Baltimore. 

Mind you, Baltimore was 88 percent white in 1917. 

You'd think elected officials would want to get criminals off the streets to attract businesses into the city, because 70 percent black Baltimore is in desperate need to expand its tax base. You'd think they'd be delirious of attracting citizens to the city who could help save the crumbling housing stock, a byproduct of an neglectful black population uninterested in maintaining residential property white people long ago abandoned. 

But no, we get, "disproportionately impact black people," and mandatory one-year sentences for illegal gun possession will perpetuate the cycle of systemic racism because, "mandatory minimums have been specifically shown to overwhelmingly impact poor black people."

You can have western civilization or you can have a black population. 

It's one or the other. 

Baltimore in 2017, a 70 percent black city where elected black officials protect black criminals from being held accountable for their lawless actions, is a powerful reminder of this option. 

Civilization or Africa. 

Baltimore has a nonfatal shooting/homicide problem because of blacks, which is also why businesses hide their employees behind plexiglas (or is it plexiglass?) in the 70 percent black city. 


90 comments:

rexfreeway said...

That is Racism at it's finest. They have no problem with this law if it only applied to Whites. Obama has been out of office 6 months but his 8 years as President has set the stage for this nonsense. This will soon be the new norm across America unless we put an end to it.

Anonymous said...

Black leaders are constantly complaining about how enforcing the law "disproportionately impacts" black people. Apparently they're incapable of understanding that black people's disproportionate criminal behavior is the problem.

Lucius Vorenus

Anonymous said...

I really want to see some social metric or at least social experiment to see how far blacks and liberals will go to excuse the inexcusable- the Bart video (or lack thereof) was a spectacular example- noticing the disproportionate violence that blacks commit is a greater crime and travesty than someone being assaulted, mugged, had their life been put on the line by a stranger, rape, or even being murdered- is there a place where even the weak will inevitably draw the line? I know that the quick answer would be no, but in reality every liberal, every non-black has their breaking point with these people. The empathy center in their brain has to give out after they see enough conflicting messages as well as patterns of black violence and opportunism that are clear as day.

Is anything worse than putting blacks in a negative light or having them face consequences in line with their share of the destruction that they cause? All I know is that PR wise things are getting worse and worse for them every day. Blacks are really good at getting people to hate them through their extreme antisocial behavior and complete lack of empathy.

So in short: if you are black using illegal firearms (particularly in the commission of a crime) is acceptable. The quota for black law breakers has been reached, so if you are black go to town and wave and shoot guns at whoever you choose. Nation of laws? HA HA.

DoubleTap said...

Records are made to be broken. Do nothing but let them kill each other.

Truth Corps said...

In other news, firearms and ammo prices are near record lows and White people (with future time-orientation) are scooping them up at a record pace and stockpiling. Yet statistically speaking, there is no White gun violence problem. I wonder why?

AnalogMan said...

This is just silly. All laws have a disparate impact on black people. This is not the fault of the laws, but of black people who disproportionately break them. Is there not a single university professor, lawyer or politician in the entire USA who can see this obvious fact?

I thought that photo reminded me of something.

Meanwhile, in London, England, there has been a spate of acid attacks. A "teen" (no race specified) has been arrested. We all know what that means, don't we? Arrested in Hackney, which is like the Harlem of London. Which just goes to show, some things in nature are constant.

Anonymous said...

Obey.
Submit.
Watch TV.
No Independent Thought.
Stay Asleep.
Do Not Question Authority.
Buy.
Consume.
Marry and Reproduce.
(((They))) LIVE

Anonymous said...

It is the same in Chicago. The gangbangers that do all of the shooting are released on their own recognizance the next morning due to fifth column judges.
Will there be any city left standing in Amerikwa free from the black undertow?
Only time will tell.

Anonymous said...

“We should treat violence as a public health issue,” he said.

************************************

Okay. Would "treating violence as a public health issue" include talking about the huge expense resulting from the emergency response, transportation and trauma care provided at TAXPAYER expense for these "victims"?

I've mentioned HeyJackass.com many times in my postings, specifically a graphic titled "The Cost of Stupidity". I don't know if PK, SCC and W.H. Thompson (HJ's admin) know each other, but after a couple of mentions here and at SCC about this graphic being absent for 2017, it is back!

The numbers are still based on case averages, but the fundamentals apply as time goes by. Average ER expenses come out to $55,000 per gunshot patient. Ambulance ride is $1,000, but about 20% of the victims self-transport or get dropped off at the hospital. A homicide related autopsy adds another $800 to OUR tab.

Those numbers are JUST the immediate, emergency medical expenses racked up to stabilize the patient. These numbers do NOT consider hospice care, long term aftercare, or disability payments via SSDI.

These numbers are also only for the 236 square miles within the city limits of Chicago. Suburban Cook County, or the other Northeast Illinois / Northwest Indiana counties that make up "Chicagoland" are NOT included.

These numbers also don't account for other war zones in Illinois, such as Rockford, Aurora, Naperville or East St. Louis.

Former Texas Governor Rick Perry ruffled some feathers a few years back by mentioning the possibility of Texas seceeding from the Union. A better option would be what I call the "Survivor" option. Some of these ultra-liberal, tax and spend, sanctuary city-states should either get with the fucking program or risk being voted off the island. Meaning EXPELLED from the Union.

Expulsion would result in loss of representation in DC, and the former state would revert to Territory status. They would also be subject to forensic auditing to account for all the revenue that somehow never seemed to be spent on legitimate, constitutional governmental services.

After the house-cleaning and indictments of the crooked and enabling politicians, the Territory would be administered by a federally appointed Military Governor.

In order to re-apply for statehood, the Territory would have to establish a track record of balanced budgets and lowered crime rates for a period of 5 or 10 consecutive years.

Sound pretty harsh? It was meant to.
Actions have consequences; stupidity, self-indulgence and betrayal of the public trust SHOULD have painful outcomes.

Anonymous said...

The way things stand right now, Trump will NOT win the election of 2020. For every rational person who turns 19 in 2020, there will be several more ti not just that in ferals from litters of sixteen strong who have survived to adulthood. Not to mention that all the Somalicoons shipped in by Obama will have plus seven year residency now to attain citizenship. White people do not have enough children, by ratio and in total numbers. For the long shot, white people need to start having more children now, but they still won't be enough to overturn the tide in time. Remember, Trump lost the popular vote!

There is only two years left, Trump needs to hurry the hell up and welcome white refugees from South Africa (and whatever is life in Zimbawewe). Instead of focusing on 'banning Muslim', why not just focus on prioritizing white refugees from SA, a distinctively racially persecuted group (whereas with Arab Muslims, their homelands are warzones because they are fighting each other). Prioritize the white refugees and that would use up the annual refugee quotas.

Anonymous said...

Wow. Just wow.
Only 2 things jump out.
1. Increased funding over mandatory minimums.
2. Poor blacks affected most. As though being poor is the reason for criminality.

It's strange, I'm absolutely not surprised, yet peak fatigue has been reached. Thanks again Baltimore!

At least (((yitzy))) approves.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad Marilyn Mosby had nothing to say. She should say it more.

Scot Irish

Ex New Yorker said...

I also agree that disarming felons, street gangs and other members of Baltimore will have an impact on black people. Also harsh prison sentences should be lessened for cold blooded murder. Homicide in the first degree should only be punishable by one year in prison. Criminals being arrested and put in prison really does have an alarming impact on the black community. The welfare mothers will miss their children if they are locked up in put away.

Police also have an impact on community members. Police should not be allowed anywhere near black neighborhoods. NO GO ZONES should be established like what is happening in Europe with the new arrivals from third world shit holes. No cops. No arrest. No problems.

Politicians should not be concerned with people that enjoy blowing the shit out of each other. This is a problem that can be taken care of within the confines of the black community itself. What happens in the ghetto should stay in the ghetto. Everyone else should stay out.

I noticed that the word "poor" was used four times in the article and the word "funding" was used only once. Poverty has always been the excuse used for black failure. Funding has always been the magic juju for solving the problem. With more funding from Uncle Nanny a giant pit could be dug in the middle of Coonville. The pit could be used as a place to throw the dead bodies. Dead bodies lying on the streets, sidewalks and alleys could very well have a negative impact on the black community. Hundreds of stiffs lying in the streets would have an effect on local traffic. Having a big pit to dump the bodies will help to keep the streets clean.

I do not care what black people do to each other. Why would anyone else care. They have found an incredible way to deal with their own personal problems. They kill each other.

Bill in St Louis said...

"Kristerfer Burnett". Obviously his parents were related before the wedding, and I'm guessing he got a participation trophy for anything he tried in life. Kristerfer. At least he isn't a "Demonte'", or a "La-a", (pronounced Ladasha, the - don't be silent). FFS, I normally don't wish death upon humans, but, Kristerfer?
On to the meat, all white people need to leave Baltimore tomorrow. Just leave. The city is lost, with this type of (thinking?) there is no hope. None.
Stay alert, stay alive.

Mr. Rational said...

He argued that mandatory minimums do not decrease crime.

Meanwhile, Second City Cop lists numerous crimes committed by thugs who could (and should) have been denied bail.

Imprisonment prevents the convicts from harming anyone outside the prison.  The unfortunate officers in Tom Dart's jail probably wish the remaining inmates to be re-inflicted on the coonmunity.

“We know mandatory minimums have been specifically shown to overwhelmingly impact poor black people...."

They overwhelmingly impact the stupid and those without future time orientation to keep from committing crimes.  That Blacks are grossly over-represented is a fact of evolution, without moral significance.

Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby, whose office often strikes plea deals with gun offenders in which the offenders receive sentences of less than a year in prison, was not at the press conference.

The obvious solution is for a repeat gun offender to remove Marilyn J. Mosby.

Anonymous said...

I live in 96% black South Africa. I wish Americans would wake up and save their nation before it is too late. If you do not curb the growth of the negroid population your country will eventually be a corrupt cesspit of crime. If you think its bad now you have no idea of how much worse it can get.

Californian said...

Once again we see the fraud of the civil rites movement.

The claim was made that blacks wanted to be treated according to the content-of-their-character(tm). The point to mandatory minimums was that by making sentencing automatic, discriminatory factors which were alleged to let White criminals off the hook would be taken out of the system. But now black "leaders" are telling us that they want to be judged according to the color-of-their-skin(tm). i.e., a black who commits a crime should be in some special protected category. The fact that blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime goes out the window.

It might also be pointed out that Whites are affected disproportionately by black perpetrated crime: by having to pay the taxes to support the prison system and provide medical care for the victims. Then there are the usual factors of destruction of schools, streets and infrastructure, a not incidental byproduct of black criminality, all of which impacts mightily on YT.

The logical outcome of the "disproportionately impact black people" argument is that blacks ought to be allowed to commit "X" amount of crime and not be penalized. Which is pretty much happens, de facto, once these policies are implemented.

Which gets to the agenda here. That's to give blacks a free hand in committing crimes. We've already seen the "space to destroy" policy put into effect during the recent black perpetrated pillaging of Baltimore. It's one more battle against YT's civilization, a struggle in the ongoing war to bring Africa to America.

Something to think about in the coming chaos.

As always:

Stay armed
Stay alert

Anonymous said...

A financial incentive to keep thugettes from breeding is the only answer (other than forcibly repatriating them to Liberia) to control the feral black overpopulation. $5000 will get any feral black female to tie her tubes thus ending the black feral problem in less than 18 years. And there are plenty of black physicians that would perform the service for free.

Anonymous said...

This bill is NOT about mandatory one-year sentences for being black. It IS about mandatory one-year sentences for illegal gun possession. Therefore, if blacks do not want to be disproportionately affected by it then they should stop carrying illegal firearms. I suspect that they are afraid of whites returning to a safe Baltimore and being gentrified out of their "neighborhoods".


Raccoon said...

My God. "Baltimore leaders on Friday proposed a mandatory one-year sentence for illegal gun possession within 100 yards of a school, park, church, public building or other public place of assembly within the city."

As PB and other Aussies would attest, this is the sort of shit we have to put up with regarding SMOKING, on a daily basis!

We cannot light up a fag within 10 metres "of a school, park, church, public building or other public place of assembly within the city." .

Nor, indeed, a bus stop, or even within our OWN FUCKING CARS if there is a passenger under the age of 18. There is a big push at the moment to ban smoking at multi-residential premises, either hi-rise or semi-detached.

So much for the enjoyment of lighting up a spliff in the sanctity of your own home or vehicle...

Paintjob Theory said...

"a mandatory one-year sentence for illegal gun possession within 100 yards of a school, park, church, public building or other public place of assembly within the city.

But if you want to be a felon with a gun elsewhere in the city that's A-OK. I'm not sure why these coons don't just make it illegal for negroes to shoot each other if that's what they're really trying to address.

“It’s going to disproportionately impact black people and communities negatively."

I mean you can't expect Shitavious, fresh out of prison to NOT go out and steal himself a gun. These laws are always just so oppressive to blackie. Just another example of the man trying to keep a brother down.

Of course basically any law which is actually enforced disproportionately effects black Africans. As Stoddard put it:

The very discipline of the social order oppresses the Under-Man; it thwarts and chastises him at every turn. To wild natures society is a torment, while the congenital caveman, placed in civilization, is always in trouble and usually in jail.

"I haven’t seen any evidence that mandatory minimums actually deter any sort of crime.”

Unless the "minimum" is a 1 way trip to Africa, life in prison, or death it won't even reduce recidivism. As I've said before, in sub Saharan Africa they perform unimaginable tortures and capital punishments on each other and this does nothing to deter their natural tendency towards criminality. You can't take the bark out of the dog, the jump out of the frog, or the nig out of the nog.

Enjoy the show, white America, you're paying for it.

Robin Naybors said...

We can’t have laws that disproportionally affect black people. These laws just hurt black people. Laws are racist towards black people. Black people, black people, black, black, black, black, black……

Taxation disproportionally affects WHITE people. Let’s get rid of those laws and systems first, and then watch as the rest works itself right on out.

Negroes are the punk ass bitches of the known universe.

Anonymous said...

Welcomed back Baltimore because I just want to see blogger comments on how the bad crime & politicans are awful in the city over the years. Because the comments make me laugh at so hard. Wow 88% white in 1917 and 70% black in 2017 just over 100 years some people might say things change over time it the way of life and nobody can't stop it hate to bust everyone bubble

Anonymous said...

The ultimate Catch 22.

"Gun Violence" is out of control. Those commitng the gun violence happen to be black not only because it's a 70% black city, but because blacks for some reason just happen to be more violent.

How do we solve this dilemma, by sentencing those who actually commit the crimes to a year in prison? Not on your life as blacks would be disproportionately impacted.

Don't expect the murder rate to decrease anytime soon.

Anonymous said...

Alas! The killer apes of Baltimore do not wish to be held responsible for their subhuman and abhorrent behaviour. Tsk! Tsk! Tsk! What to do? What to do? Ship them all off to the Carribean so they can "enrich" the beautiful white beaches with their filth, litter, feces and oh so valuable turd-like black bodies.
Off topic but am loving how the new, diverse, vibrant Spider Man movie has tanked at the box office. The merchants from the Levant at Sony and Disney must be scratching their heads wondering what's happening. I'm loving it!

Anonymous said...

@anonymous or Scot irish quote Marilyn mosby had nothing to say. There are talks of Marilyn mosby running for governor of Maryland or even mayor of Baltimore or higher up office like US president with the help of SJW on her side to support her ideas

Anonymous said...

Any law or rule on the books disproportionately impacts blacks. I've watched it since kindergarten. If there is are rules, blacks tend to break them.

Anonymous said...

@analog man quote there was attack in London England section Hackney which is like Harlem. Thats of topic plus I think everyone love to talk about Baltimore even more than London now. Plus there's difference Harlem is going through a change now in the past it was more black and Hispanic now it's SJW and less diversify and less crime so they say. Hackney I guessing more diversify with blacks, Muslim, Hindu and other in the mix

Anonymous said...

“I haven’t seen any evidence that mandatory minimums actually deter any sort of crime.”

[ that’s because they only deter YT, jails a joke for a negro ] This article is dated April, 2015, but what a hum dinger!

http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/america tonight/articles/2015/4/23/baltimore-jail-gang.html

[excerpt from article]: At BCDC, (Baltimore City Detention Center) heroin, crack cocaine and cell phones flowed in freely from the outside. Tavon White, the gang's kingpin in the jail, fathered five children with four corrections officers. His powerful influence reached the streets, where he coordinated drug deals and proclaimed he could order a hit on any former inmate or employee who didn't join the BGF gang. Recorded on a wire tap, he proclaimed, "This is my jail" and "I am the law."

Anonymous said...

Think of what we did to German and Japanese cities in WW2, fire-bombing them, even using nuclear weapons on them. And ask yourself--what had the Japanese or Germans done to us? Compared to what the black undertow has done to almost every American city? As far as I know, not a single American woman was raped by a German or Japanese, nor a single American city harmed by them (Pearl Harbor was a naval base, and Hawai'i was not a state in 1941). Vietnam: same idea. Was a single American building, city, or woman on US territory harmed by any Vietnamese individual? Or Korean? Or Iraqi? Syrian?

Where is the idea of proportionality? Do black leaders really want to bring up the idea of "disproportionate impact?" At what point do we realize we're in a war on our home turf and losing badly? In fact (eg. recent BART video) our "leaders" are preventing us from even seeing the reality of the war. As more and more American cities fall under control of the forces of barbarism, Trump's question takes on real urgency: do Americans have the will to preserve the great civilization they built?

me said...

If Trump wants to put up a wall it needs to be built around cities like Baltimore.

Mr. Rational said...

Which gets to the agenda here. That's to give blacks a free hand in committing crimes.

I think it was Vox Day who said the left's agenda was freedom for (not from) aggression.

The merchants from the Levant at Sony and Disney must be scratching their heads wondering what's happening.

Oh, (((they))) know.  The point isn't to make money, but to degrade the icon and its associated culture.  To normalize pathology and pathologize normality.

[ that’s because they only deter YT, jails a joke for a negro ]

There's direct prevention.  While locked up inside, they can't do any harm outside.

...Formerly Miss Greenbaum... said...

I see this as a white problem more than anything. Blacks do what blacks do, which is rape, rob, butcher, and murder. I see so many white SJWs who scream that blacks suffer from racism and it is wrong to ever call them out over their deeds. Indeed, many women march in the street with signs saying, "Open Borders", "The only race is the human race", etc. etc.

Whites are our biggest obstacle over eradicating the negro problem. Until enough of them get raped, robbed, assaulted, we are going to see this pattern continue. The nig will indeed continue to nog.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad Marilyn Mosby had nothing to say. She should say it more.


Amen!

Anonymous said...

"Welcomed back Baltimore because I just want to see blogger comments on how the bad crime & politicans are awful in the city over the years. Because the comments make me laugh at so hard. Wow 88% white in 1917 and 70% black in 2017 just over 100 years some people might say things change over time it the way of life and nobody can't stop it hate to bust everyone bubble

Why does PK allow this niggerbabble to keep getting posted?

With regards to the story, when Ryan Dorsey says "We should treat violence as a public health issue" the conscienceless, violent, overgrown toddlers hear:

Whitey finna pay fo dis mess. Aybah poda hep an Whitey gosta pay cuh dey gots ah de munny.

That's what it's all about. De munny. They think guns are like heroin. You possess a gun like you possess heroin. When you slam heroin, it's akin to shooting and killing someone. Same high, different delivery method.

D-FENS said...

"Was a single American building, city, or woman on US territory harmed by any Vietnamese individual? Or Korean? Or Iraqi? Syrian?"

Why do you hate America? These wars were fought to protect our freedoms. Do you have a problem with freedom here at home or spreading it around the globe? America is an exceptional nation ordained by god and therefore we all have a moral responsibility to be a force for good around the world. And when this is not possible, we must invite the world in to share the blessings jesus has bestowed upon us.

Now let's put on a Lee Greenwood song and salute Old Glory.

I'm proud to be an American, where at least I think I'm free...

Brian in Ohio said...

Any law, whether it be against murder or spitting on the sidewalk, will disproportionately affect blacks.

Trying to hold an African to Western standards is a fools errand.

Stay alert, stay alive.

D-FENS said...

The law will disproportionately impact negroes only if it is enforced.

Anonymous said...

Oh, it can be stopped alright. You may want to use your "way back machine" top go back to the result 1960's here in America. At that time the laws were written to protect white people and their posterity. You may want to do some research on that. Very back to us once you have and tell us what you've come up with in your research.

Anonymous said...

Post OT alert,

Ghetto payday foiled by police video in Alabama:

http://lawofficer.com/news/man-claims-police-beat-him-to-death-then-video-footage-is-released/


I don't watch the Caliphate News Network but I bet they are running with the story with their double digit IQ teleprompter readers in hands up don't shoot mode.

Anonymous said...

Like I've said before, the typical hoodrat doesn't care about rules or laws unless they can opportunistically use them as a weapon of revenge against someone they feel has done them wrong. No different than having a brick available to conveniently be picked up and chucked at someone's head who has angered them. It's the same way in which they see cops- they're just another tool of revenge-a tool that can be summoned and used to do their bidding. Otherwise, cops should leave them alone to do as they please and no rules or laws should be applied to them or else it's an attack on the black community, has a disproportionate effect and is oppression and racism.

Get it yet, white man? They don't want your civilization but they'll use whatever they can from it for their own purposes and to their own benefit. Shaniqua doesn't mind calling the popo when Dadarious steals her tv and she wants revenge but the popo better not be stoppin' her and giving her a ticket when she runs a stop sign another day because that doesn't serve her purpose- so she chimps out and has a fit over it. She bein' attacked by da racists fo' driving while black!

If malls banned black teens because black teens are creating havoc by fighting and stealing and assaulting other patrons in the mall, do you honestly think blacks want all teens banned out of a sense of fairness, justice and equal treatment? Do you think when black kids are punished more in school because of their behavior and blacks demand other races be punished to equal levels regardless of the fact that they aren't misbehaving at the same levels that it's about fairness, justice and equal treatment? NO. It's about REVENGE for holding them accountable and applying your honky civilized standards upon them. They're attacking you and yours for daring to do so and seeking to punish you for it.

Disproportional effect is simply their saying, "We can't live up to the standards of a civilized world or conduct ourselves in a civilized manner and resent being forced to and resent being held to account when we fail to do so." That is what's behind all their screams of racism, oppression, disproportional effect and disparate impact. You're keeping them down and not letting them fully express their primitive African genome. How dare you!

Anonymous said...

Detroit Free Press is doing a 50th anniversary edition of the riots. Oh how time does fly!

Let's look back at 1967, termed "The Summer of Love":

January 14, The Human Be-In takes place in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco; the event sets the stage for the Summer of Love.

February 2 – The American Basketball Association is formed.

May 2 – Armed members of the Black Panther Party enter the California state capital to protest a bill that restricted the carrying of arms in public.

May 6 – Four hundred students seize the administration building at Cheney State College, now Cheyney University of Pennsylvania, the oldest institute for higher education for African Americans.

June 11 – A race riot occurs in Tampa, Florida after the shooting death of Martin Chambers by police while allegedly robbing a camera store. The unrest lasts several days.

June 26 – The Buffalo Race Riot begins, lasting until July 1; leads to 200 arrests.

July 12 – After the arrest of an African-American cab driver for allegedly illegally driving around a police car and gunning it down the road, rioting breaks out in Newark, New Jersey, and continues for five days.

July 14 – Near Newark, New Jersey, the Plainfield riots also occur.

July 16 – A prison riot in Jay, Florida leaves 37 dead.

July 19 – A race riot breaks out in the North Side of Minneapolis on Plymouth Street during the Minneapolis Aquatennial Parade and business are vandalized and fires break out in the area, although the disturbance is quelled within hours. However, the next day a shooting sets off another incident in the same area that leads to 18 fires, 36 arrests, 3 shootings, 2 dozen people injured, and damages totaling 4.2 million. There will be two more such incidents in the following two weeks.

July 23 – 12th Street Riot: In Detroit, one of the worst riots in United States history begins on 12th Street in the predominantly African American inner city: 43 are killed, 342 injured and 1,400 buildings burned.

The 1967 Milwaukee race riots begin, lasting through August 2 and leading to a ten-day shutdown of the city from August 1.

August 1 – Race riots in the United States spread to Washington, D.C.


50 years have passed- and yet their behavior has remained the same. Same thing worldwide. I'll buy your nurture argument after I buy that bridge you were offering me.



Anonymous said...

Perhaps the only reason the law "targets" blacks is bc blacks are predominantly the ones doing it. If there was a law that said all children who live in a two parent household have to pay extra taxes which would disproportionately affect whites and Asians does the law target whites and Asians?

The answer is of course not, it only affects those meet the criteria. Stupid primates think 1+1=racist.

Pat Boyle said...

What does it all mean?

The answer is - nothing good.

I have been trying to get another gun or two. I live in an earthquake zone and all the experts assure us that it will soon be the site of a major natural catastrophe. The last big earthquake hereabouts in 1907 saw a lot of shootings. So I want to prepare. I figure that if I survive the big shake (quite likely) I will have to deal with black folks who have not bothered to stock up on water, food or batteries.

It's hard to estimate anyone person's impact by the black looters. I estimate I will have to kill or wound at least a half dozen negroes. It is possible that I can expect a much larger influx of thirsty and hungry blacks, in which case I will be even more busy.

This is not race war. That, if it ever comes, is still in the future. But there are ample precedents for blacks rioting and looting after natural disasters. I figure that if the average white homeowner around here shoots a small number of negroes that will discourage the others. Six should be enough.

If you think about it this way you soon realize that you don't need a lot of guns but you do need the right sort of guns. You probably need a small semi-automatic rifle with a magazine. In California that means a ten round magazine. That should be enough if you have a spare magazine or two.

The black refugees who come up the hills from the flat lands are not likely to be effective combatants. They are likely to be like the blacks in the photo that accompany this article - disorganized and expecting no resistance. They should be easy to discourage.

When I was in Basic Training in the Army, the sergeants used to have us shout "kill, kill, kill" several times a day. They wanted us to get used to the idea that we might have to defend ourselves with deadly force. That is true now for people who live in the Oakland Hills. You don't need to do much and you don't need to shoot like Annie Oakley. But you do need to be psychologically ready.

Pat

Anonymous said...

Disproportional effect is simply their saying, "We can't live up to the standards of a civilized world or conduct ourselves in a civilized manner and resent being forced to and resent being held to account when we fail to do so." That is what's behind all their screams of racism, oppression, disproportional effect and disparate impact. You're keeping them down and not letting them fully express their primitive African genome. How dare you!

Yep.

When left free to their own devices, blacks quickly cause a city to disintegrate into African standards. Then again, they just may be happy living at a primitive level. Bear in mind that up until the mid-19th century, nothing resembling civilization as we understand it existed in black Africa. Whether we are talking the Serengeti, Port au Prince or Baltimore, blacks just want to be free to roam, to raid the next tribe, to settle a blood feud with a little psychotic violence.

The dilemma is that they are dragging down the White world with them.

Anonymous said...

And what's more, there is no side effect!

Mr. Rational said...

Pat, if you're looking for more backup consider a solar panel you can hang from a window to charge batteries.  Use it regularly just to make sure everything's operational.

I once took an LED garden light and used it as a battery charger.  I was able to run a radio off the 2 AA NiCd cells it fed.  You need the same principle, only more so.

europeasant said...

"But no, we get, "disproportionately impact black people," and mandatory one-year sentences for illegal gun possession will perpetuate the cycle of systemic racism because, "mandatory minimums have been specifically shown to overwhelmingly impact poor black people."

I just wonder how many White people believe this? In my small social circle there are some and unbelievably some even voted for Obama twice! But where do they choose to live? As far away as possible from the "Jungle".

The African is Terra-forming America into Africa, one neighborhood at a time. They used to be confined to the ghettos and projectz but now they are being dispersed all over the nation.

I hope Trump gets rid of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) but I doubt it as this might cause riots just like getting rid of Affirmative action will cause trouble in cities.

Anonymous said...

It's not always being fast or even accurate that counts. It's being willing. I found out early that most men, regardless of cause or need, aren't willing. They blink an eye or draw a breath before they pull the trigger . . . and I won't.

- John Wayne as J.B. Books, The Shootist (1976)

Former Liberal said...

Fortunately, I don't reside in the people's democratic republic of California, but a red state which believes in the 2nd amendment. But given that, too many whites are just simply fast asleep. Can't get through to them either. They just look at me as a half crazy combat veteran. But glad you're thinking ahead, and I do love your insights, knowledge and comments. The only way some of these people are going to wake up is when some kind of natural or economic disaster does hit. By then, for many, it will be too late

Anonymous said...

I don't understand the concept that mandatory sentences don't reduce crime.

If you are locked in a cage, you are not shooting people in the streets.

And doesn't just about every Law disproportionately impact blacks?

When you break the Law more than everyone else then of course you will be disproportionately arrested for it.

I feel like im living in a Twilight Zone episode.

Anonymous said...

"The very discipline of the social order oppresses the Under-Man; it thwarts and chastises him at every turn. "

Ironically, it's the discipline of the social order, in the West based ultimately in Christian morality, which also prevents a natural response from whites: racial self-defense. So it's not only the Under-Man who is oppressed by technological civilization, with its endless laws and rules and regulations. Whites lose too.

"Enjoy the show, white America, you're paying for it."

They created it, keep it running, and pay for it. They do everything except accept responsibility for it.

Anonymous said...

OT, but relevant . . . .

In the past several weeks a few posters have asked questions about becoming self-sufficient or at least less dependent on the grid.

http://permies.com

This is a site that focuses on permaculture and homesteading. There is a MASSIVE amount of info on the site and the forums related to home power generation, gardening, water harvesting and filtration, and almost any other topic related to off-grid living. Some of the posters actually do volunteer work in the third world and use these concepts frequently.

Snicker if you must, but once this train derails, most of the US will be a third world. Would you rather expand your skill set NOW, when you can afford to experiment a little, or do you want to wait until it's a do-or-die scenario?

"Chance favors the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur

Anonymous said...

I always enjoy your blog PK. This is the same blog community that disconnected True News USA. I suppose the Negros and their supporters did not liked being called every name in the book. The thing about True News USA was it did not selectively discriminate against blacks; bad whites and other races were equally lampooned. The only true freedom is creating your own blog address that has nothing to do with YouTube or any of the other left wing sites. Yet...you are getting the message out! The reason I am bringing this out is because I heard a YouTube video with Colin Flaherty saying how he is finished with YouTube. His videos were not in the least bit racist, but showed only facts. I would add your site and Amren does the same thing. I understand why you only can allow so much ranting from your audience...it is because of the blog you belong to. I'm sure there are lots of people named Shitavious that would like to close you down.

Iron Sharpens Iron said...

I don't understand ebonics. I guess I'm too white. But can anyone please explain to me what "Abya poda hep" means, especially the "poda" part?

Anonymous said...

While I understand and agree with the larger message of this article, as a member of the Baltimore City Council, I would certainly have voted this mandatory sentencing down, as well. Why? Because there is NO such thing as illegal gun possession. The Second Amendment guarantees the inalienable right to keep and bear arms which "...shall NOT be infringed." That means not limited or taken away, even a tiny bit, which makes background checks, concealed permits and every gun law on the books un-Constitutional. That's a fact. If you are alive and an American, you have a right to own a gun without anyone's permission or approval: period. Having said that, there is a more Constitutional friendly way to implement the proposed Baltimore law; make a mandatory one-year sentence for ALL gun-related crime. There you go.

Anonymous said...

Laziness, stupidity, illiteracy and criminality all affect blacks disproportionately. I'm sensing a pattern here.

Anonymous said...

I don't understand ebonics. I guess I'm too white. But can anyone please explain to me what "Abya poda hep" means, especially the "poda" part?

It is Ebonics for "Everybody is supposed to help."

Anonymous said...

The criminal laws do in fact impact black people more, as they make up a disproportionate share of the criminal element.

However, by not imprisoning black criminals for gun possession, it's more likely that they'll get another gun and shoot a black person.

Anonymous said...

As we've seen in every other black-dominated city, they want our money but they don't want our interference in their day-to-day.

They love the biscuits and gravy, they just don't want to be held to ANY standard to receive it. Robbin', rapin', thuggin' is just wut dey do. Interference is racist. Spending (wasting) boatloads of cash, falsely propping them up is 'reparations'.

Until we can either disconnect from the big cities and de-fund their growth or put some politicians in place that are willing to be very unpopular with the 'hep me' crowd, we will continue to witness the decline of America.

Jim in Jersey

Bobby PGH said...

I don't know what everyone is complaining about? I am personally against anything that would deter the monkies in Baltimore from killing each other on a mass scale. I enjoy watchjng the body count numbers tick up exponentially.

Anonymous said...

PHOTOS: White woman from 98% white Carmel, IN invites a bunch of black people to feed for free at her wedding reception after her wedding gets canceled. White women are out of control.

ha ha ha ha ha

http://www.indystar.com/picture-gallery/life/2017/07/15/would-be-bride-welcomes-the-homeless-to-her-wedding-reception/103724354/

SKIP said...

"Laziness, stupidity, illiteracy and criminality all affect blacks disproportionately. I'm sensing a pattern here."

Well then! recognizing that clearly makes you a racissssssssssst!

Anonymous said...

Everybody supposed to help"in ebonics"

PB said...

"I don't understand the concept that mandatory sentences don't reduce crime."

It works as a deterrent to others, but only in communities that have future time orientation, an understanding of the concept of consequ......Oh, you know what I mean.

With Blackie it just means warehousing.

Anonymous said...

As if the common negro isn't ignorant enough wont this cause even more mass confusion when next month Aug 4-6 they're challenging the plague to not shoot each other ? (SBPDL article July 11) What the hell is the nigga spose to do? Ask em not to shoot each other AND THEN turn around and tell em it's ok we oppose any law that says it's not ok to have illegal guns ? Damn you wonder why they're so fucking stupid cus that's all they know is stupid.

Mr. Rational said...

can anyone please explain to me what "Abya poda hep" means, especially the "poda" part?

https://sbpdlglossary.wordpress.com/

Alfa158 said...

"Burnett said the city would be better off increasing funding for Safe Streets and schools to combat violence."
Translation: if you put people in jail there's no money in it for us. If you increase funding for "safe streets and schools", ultimately the brothas and sistas be getting paid.

Anonymous said...

CRIMINALS are affected disproportionately because they break the law. In the vast majority of cases, the criminals are BLACK! Hello?

Anonymous said...

Off topic and needs to be read. Article concerns White South Africans fearing for their safety and they need a place to immigrate to.Notice the picture in the article, says a lot.This could damn well be our future if we don't watch out!


http://www.wnd.com/2017/07/real-refugees-white-south-africans-facing-genocide/?cat_orig=us

Anonymous said...

It is far past time to institute a voluntary sterilization program that would reward a one time cash pay out for blacks. If not now, when?

Negro offers nothing, they are a burden upon the United States. Perhaps we should start deporting them to Mexico and Africa.

First separation, then repatriation

Anonymous said...

Adult daycare😃

Anonymous said...

In the words of Public Enemy 'Shut it Down'!!!

Anonymous said...

8:11am- "Why does PK allow this niggerbabble to keep getting posted?"
I believe one of our [Former-]Detroit guys nailed it weeks ago, when he identified this jibberjabberer as a gook. To me, it's like a bunch of men are talking in the backyard, and a crow on the roof periodically chimes in to "add to" our discussion, causing us to occasionally give it a WTF glare, draw another sip of beer, then continue the conversation.
Where were we, again? Oh yeah. Negroes.

AnalogMan said...

Raccoon said...

So much for the enjoyment of lighting up a spliff in the sanctity of your own home or vehicle...

Oh, stop it; you're breaking my heart.

Nobody is saying you can't smoke in your own home or car. Just that you can't inflict your crud on others - strangers or children. Why would you want to do that?

It's the same principle as defecation. Nobody's saying don't do it, just don't do it in public. But if a negro does it in the street, suddenly it's a problem for you? How are you different from that negro?

Oh, but smoke is different, because you don't mind smoke. Well, some people do mind smoke. By all means, kill yourself in any way you choose; I'll applaud you. Just leave me out of it.

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...

Hackney I guessing more diversify with blacks, Muslim, Hindu and other in the mix

My mistake; I've never seen Harlem, know it only by reputation. Hackney, I haven't seen since 1999, and then it was black, black, black like Soweto. Since everybody hates blacks, I doubt it has any real diversity today. Once you go black, you can never go back.

Anonymous said...

Yes, like in the movie Escape from New York.

Anonymous said...

Everybody is supposed to help! ;)

Ya know, like at all the black neighborhood cleanup days! Everybody is supposed to help the African't-Americans take care of getting by in a first world culture.

Anonymous said...

If you can't carry concealed without a permit, if you can't carry a gun because you are a convicted felon...

Anonymous said...

What's the saying? Give a white man a pile of bricks and you'll get a city. Give a black man. A city and you'll get a pile of bricks!

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...

I'm sure there are lots of people named Shitavious that would like to close you down.

Speaking of negro names, here's another one for your collection.

Kaffir beats his tutor* to death in front of witnesses. Black prosecutor helps a brother out by sitting on the case, then declaring it's too late, now. Have to let him go.

Prosecutor's name? Would you believe Vegina Trimetric Hawkins?

* Trying to teach an ape calculus. What was he thinking?

Anonymous said...

I think you mean put some politicians in their place. I'd like to see that Minnesota politician, who told his constituents to "move somewhere else" because they don't want Somali rapefugees in their town, tarred and feathered, if not something worse.

Anonymous said...

PK says: "You can have western civilization or you can have a black population."

Absolutely true but the same could be said for mexicans and other south of the border types, they bring hell on earth too. Don't fool yourself YT into thinking they're "good minorities" because they work. They also tap the welfare system (fraudulently) as least as much as negroes, have the highest teen pregnancy rate (hispanics in general) according to VDare and commit as much crime as negroes. They and other hispanics have turned Southern California especially L.A. into Mexico el Norte and they hate YT.

Anonymous said...

"PHOTOS: White woman from 98% white Carmel, IN invites a bunch of black people to feed for free at her wedding reception after her wedding gets canceled. White women are out of control."

Indeed. Looking at the pictures of the reception dinner I couldn't help notice the Negresses were morbidly obese. In spite of their obvious starvation (as indicated by their 400 Lb. carcasses) that wasn't the kind of food the Negresses and their sprogs eat. They were hoping for KFC, Big Macs and fries, 40 ounce beverages to wash it down with and an ounce of weed for dessert. It was free to them from stupid white people so what the hell; "Let's go see what these stupid white mofos are giving away to us today" the nogs were thinking.

Anonymous said...

"Why does PK allow this niggerbabble to keep getting posted?"

To remind us of how ignorant they are.

Anonymous said...

They can't kill each other fast enough here in Mogadishu by the Chesapeake. This is a dead city. White people are leaving in droves.

Anonymous said...

Boy, imagine my embarrassment when on Saturday I went to see 'War for the planet of the apes'. I was thinking it was the movie based on the 50 year anniversary of the Detroit 1967 riot.

Anonymous said...

Regarding the post at 5:22 p.m. on July 16th.

When all the white farmers are gone and the groids are starving to death, there will be, guaranteed, a big push here to donate to "help feed the poor, starving people and children of South Africa."
Not a fricken chance I would donate. I wouldn't even donate a pile of my own feces for them to eat. Screw those animal retards.

Anonymous said...

I live in southern Arizona. There's these sonoran hotdog stands all over town, and I'm certain a good number of them are totally or partially subsidised by the huge amount of EBT food assistance they get for all 5 or more kids they have. Just another day hustling YT.

Fled The Undertow said...

The whole precept of "disparate impact" is the most pernicious, anti-white legal principal ever invented.